American Tech Companies Strike Back Against Brazilian Judicial Overreach in Landmark Free Speech Lawsuit
By Hotspotnews
In a bold defense of American sovereignty and the First Amendment, Rumble Inc. and Trump Media & Technology Group have filed a powerful opposition brief in federal court, exposing the Brazilian government’s contradictory tactics in its attempt to shield Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes from accountability.
As highlighted by plaintiffs’ counsel Martin De Luca, Brazil has told the U.S. Department of Justice that its court orders operate strictly within Brazil, with no extraterritorial effect, and must be served through formal channels like the MLAT or Hague Convention. Yet in this U.S. federal case, Brazil now seeks dismissal by claiming Moraes’ emailed orders to Florida — demanding censorship of U.S. platforms and users — are unreviewable sovereign acts.
This is not legitimate enforcement of Brazilian law at home. It is an attempt by a foreign judge to reach into the United States via email and impose restrictions on American companies and citizens. As the filing rightly notes, respect for sovereignty “cuts both ways.”
The document in question is the cover page of a 24-page legal brief filed July 14, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida (Tampa Division):
•Case: Rumble Inc. and Trump Media & Technology Group Corp. v. Alexandre de Moraes
•Case No.: 8:25-cv-00411-MSS-AAS
•Document: Plaintiffs’ Joint Opposition to the Federative Republic of Brazil’s Motion to Dismiss
For years, Moraes has issued sweeping gag orders, account suspensions, and massive fines targeting conservative voices, journalists, and critics of Brazil’s current administration. When convenient, Brazilian officials claim their orders have no reach beyond Brazil. In this lawsuit, they sing a different tune.
Rumble and Trump Media’s 2025 lawsuit seeks a declaration that Moraes’ orders are unenforceable in the United States, plus injunctions and damages. Their fight underscores a core principle: foreign governments cannot bypass U.S. law to censor American citizens and companies.
This case is bigger than two platforms. It is a stand against globalist censorship and a test of whether the United States will allow rogue foreign actors to undermine our Constitution from afar. While much of Big Tech has often yielded to progressive pressures, Rumble and Truth Social are refusing to comply.
A strong ruling for the plaintiffs would send a clear message: The First Amendment applies on American soil, and foreign judges cannot enforce their will here through backdoor emails and threats. In an era of rising international tension over speech and information, this lawsuit is a vital defense of liberty and American values.
