Brazil’s Steel Industry Pushed to the Brink: A Call for Protection and Reform
By Hotspotnews
Brazil’s steel industry, a cornerstone of the nation’s industrial might, is teetering on the edge of collapse, warns André Gerdau Johannpeter, chairman of Gerdau SA, one of the country’s largest steelmakers. The sector is grappling with an unprecedented crisis driven by a flood of cheap imports, primarily from China, coupled with global trade tensions and weak domestic demand. This dire situation threatens not only jobs and economic stability but also Brazil’s ability to maintain a robust industrial base in an increasingly competitive global market. It’s time for the government to take decisive action to protect this vital industry while fostering an environment that encourages innovation and self-reliance.
The steel industry in Brazil is operating at a staggering 35% idle capacity—nearly double the level considered sustainable. Import penetration has surged, with foreign steel now claiming 22% to 25% of the domestic market, up from just 10% in the past. This influx of low-cost steel, particularly from China, is undercutting local producers, who are struggling to compete against what many describe as unfair trade practices. The quota-tariff system implemented by the Brazilian government has proven inadequate, failing to stem the tide of imports that are eroding the industry’s competitiveness. As Gerdau’s chairman bluntly stated, the sector is nearing “unsustainability,” with the risk of dismantling Brazil’s steel supply chain entirely.
This crisis is not just about steel; it’s about the broader economic implications for Brazil. The steel industry supports countless jobs, from factory workers to suppliers in construction, automotive, and machinery sectors. If local producers like Gerdau, Usiminas, and ArcelorMittal are forced to scale back further, the ripple effects could devastate communities and stifle economic growth. Already, these companies have announced cuts in capital spending, with Gerdau planning to reduce investments starting in 2026 due to the lack of effective trade protections. This retreat signals a troubling loss of confidence in Brazil’s industrial future.
The root causes of this crisis are multifaceted. Global oversupply, driven by China’s aggressive export strategy, has flooded markets with cheap steel, often produced under less stringent environmental and labor standards. Meanwhile, U.S. tariffs on Brazilian steel exports—now at a hefty 25%—have closed off a critical market, leaving domestic producers squeezed between rising costs and shrinking demand. A depreciating exchange rate further exacerbates the problem, making imports more expensive for consumers while failing to level the playing field for local manufacturers. These external pressures, combined with sluggish domestic demand, have created a perfect storm for Brazil’s steelmakers.
From a conservative perspective, this situation underscores the need for a government that prioritizes national interests and economic sovereignty. While free trade has its merits, allowing foreign powers to undermine a critical industry through predatory pricing is unacceptable. The Brazilian government must strengthen trade defenses, including more robust tariffs and stricter enforcement of anti-dumping measures. The current quota system, which imposes tariffs of 9% to 16% within limits and 25% beyond, is too porous to protect local producers effectively. A more comprehensive approach, akin to the European Union’s or even the U.S.’s protectionist policies, could provide breathing room for the industry to regroup.
Moreover, the government should resist the temptation to rely solely on short-term fixes like tariffs. Long-term competitiveness requires investment in innovation and efficiency. Brazil’s steel industry has shown promise in this regard, with Gerdau leading the way in decarbonization efforts, such as using biochar to reduce emissions. These initiatives not only position Brazil as a potential leader in green steel but also align with global trends toward sustainability. However, such advancements require capital, which is now at risk as companies scale back investments due to market pressures. The government could incentivize modernization through tax breaks or subsidies for research and development, ensuring the industry remains viable in a carbon-conscious world.
Critics of protectionism argue that raising trade barriers could increase costs for consumers and industries reliant on steel, such as construction and automotive manufacturing. While this concern is valid, the alternative—allowing the steel industry to collapse—would be far more damaging. A weakened domestic supply chain would leave Brazil dependent on foreign producers, exposing the economy to geopolitical risks and price volatility. A balanced approach, combining targeted trade protections with policies to enhance productivity, could mitigate these concerns while preserving the industry’s role as an economic engine.
President Lula’s administration has acknowledged the crisis, launching an antidumping investigation into 25 steel products from China. This is a step in the right direction, but it’s not enough. The government must act swiftly to expand these measures and address the structural challenges facing the industry. Brazil stands at a crossroads: it can either allow its steel sector to be dismantled by global forces or take bold steps to protect and revitalize it. The latter path requires courage, foresight, and a commitment to putting Brazil’s economic interests first.
In the face of this turbulent year, as Gerdau’s chairman described it, Brazil must reaffirm its industrial heritage. The steel industry is not just a collection of factories; it’s a symbol of the nation’s resilience and capacity for growth. By strengthening trade defenses, investing in innovation, and fostering a business environment that rewards competitiveness, Brazil can ensure that its steelmakers not only survive but thrive. The alternative—surrendering to the flood of imports and global trade wars—is a future no Brazilian should accept.
Source: X, AI, Bloomberg