Lula’s Convenient Amnesia: Rewriting the Pandemic Blame Game
By Hotspotnews
President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva has perfected the art of political memory loss. In a May 2026 ceremony establishing a National Day in Memory of COVID-19 Victims, the Brazilian leader claimed he “never, personally, accused” former President Jair Bolsonaro of responsibility for the pandemic deaths. He added that presidents “are not obligated to know everything” and simply need to listen to experts. The statement was delivered with the solemnity of a statesman reflecting on tragedy. It is also a transparent rewrite of history.
For years, Lula and his allies treated Bolsonaro’s pandemic record as original sin. They labeled the former president’s approach a “genocide,” an “unnecessary sacrifice,” and a crime against humanity. Lula himself repeatedly suggested that hundreds of thousands of the more than 700,000 Brazilian COVID deaths could have been avoided under different leadership. He demanded that medical associations and the World Health Organization pursue accountability. He mocked Bolsonaro’s public statements, highlighted ministerial turnover at the Health Ministry, and framed the prior government as a collection of willful ignoramuses who prioritized ideology over science.
That record does not vanish because Lula now finds it politically useful to soften his tone. The same speech in which he claimed never to have accused Bolsonaro was filled with pointed criticism of the previous administration’s handling of the crisis. The distinction between “personal accusation” and systematic, years-long public indictment is a lawyer’s technicality, not a serious accounting. Brazilians who lived through the pandemic remember the relentless campaign that painted Bolsonaro as the chief architect of mass death. Selective amnesia does not erase the footage, the interviews, or the campaign rhetoric.
The video circulating on social media that juxtaposes Lula’s recent remarks with his own 2020 comment only sharpens the point. At the time, still outside office, Lula declared it was “just as well that nature created this monster called the coronavirus,” arguing the crisis would force people to see the necessity of a strong state. He later called the phrasing unfortunate and apologized. The original words, however, revealed a cold instrumental view of human suffering in service of ideological preference. Pairing that moment with today’s carefully parsed denial produces a portrait of a politician who treats tragedy as raw material for narrative.
This is not about defending every decision made during an unprecedented global emergency. Pandemic policy involved hard trade-offs, imperfect information, and genuine scientific uncertainty. Many countries struggled. What is indefensible is the years of maximalist moral condemnation followed by a sudden claim of restraint. When the political calendar shifts and elections approach, the same figures who demanded perpetual reckoning discover the virtues of nuance and the limits of presidential knowledge.
Conservative observers have long noted this pattern: progressive leaders amplify institutional failure when it serves to discredit opponents, then minimize personal responsibility when it becomes inconvenient. Lula’s latest formulation—presidents need not know everything, only listen—would have been dismissed as apologetics if offered by Bolsonaro. Applied to himself, it becomes statesmanship.
Brazilians deserve a clearer memory. The pandemic exacted a terrible toll. Using that toll as a permanent political weapon, then pretending the weapon was never drawn, insults both the dead and the living. Lula’s carefully worded retreat does not demonstrate maturity. It demonstrates calculation. The record of his earlier words remains available for anyone willing to look past the revised script.
https://x.com/roxmo/status/2084097667961930050?s=61